By William Casey King
From rags to riches, log condominium to White condo, enslaved to liberator, ghetto to CEO, ambition fuels the yank Dream. americans are pushed by means of ambition. but on the time of the nation's founding, ambition was once seen as a deadly vice, every thing from "a canker at the soul" to the impetus for unique sin. This attractive booklet explores ambition's extraordinary transformation, tracing attitudes from classical antiquity to early glossy Europe to the hot global and America's founding. From this vast old point of view, William Casey King deepens our realizing of the yank mythos and gives a outstanding reinterpretation of the creation to the statement of Independence.
Through an cutting edge array of resources and authors—Aquinas, Dante, Machiavelli, the Geneva Bible, Marlowe, Shakespeare, Thomas Jefferson, and lots of others—King demonstrates remodeled view of ambition turned attainable the instant Europe discovered that Columbus had came upon no longer a brand new course yet a brand new international. additionally the writer argues that reconstituting ambition as a advantage was once an important precondition of the yankee republic. The booklet means that even within the twenty-first century, ambition hasn't ever totally misplaced its ties to vice and keeps to convey a twin nature, optimistic or unfavorable based upon the ends, the capacity, and the person concerned.
Read or Download Ambition, A History: From Vice to Virtue PDF
Best ethics books
Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, according to lectures that he gave in Athens within the fourth century BCE, is likely one of the most vital works in ethical philosophy, and has profoundly stimulated the total process next philosophical recreation. subject matters lined contain the position of success in human wellness, accountability, braveness, justice, friendship and delight.
This ebook analyzes the systemic and the moral blunders that experience ended in the monetary quandary of 2008. It explores the center floor among the argument that monetary managers can't be anticipated to take accountability for a systemic situation and the argument that ethical failure is the single and purely starting place of the situation.
This e-book contemplates the ethics of accountability in a wide variety of meanings, effects and affects. It displays the views and reasoning of 24 authors from all continents. All chapters are unique papers offered on the 5th international ISBEE Congress, that happened in Warsaw, Poland, on the Kozminski college, on 11-14 of July, 2012.
Extra resources for Ambition, A History: From Vice to Virtue
Id. at 39-46. 39. Some modern judges have allowed defendants to argue the injustice of minimum sentences to the jury, possibly as a protest against harsh mandatory sentencing guidelines. See United States v. D. Tenn. 1993). 40. See Roger D. Groot, supra note 26, 34. ”) 41. 25 Edward III, stat 5, c. 3 (1352). 42. Jon M. Van Dyke, Jury Selection Procedures: Our Uncertain Commitment to Representative Panels, 4 (1977). The Origins of the Doctrine 21 in conviction rates. 44 Because early jurors were expected to be witnesses, an “incorrect” verdict was considered perjury.
6 Glanvill’s treatise dealt only with the king’s court. It had little to do with criminal cases except those that violated the rights of the king or the king’s peace—specifically, fraudulently concealing treasure trove, homicide, arson, robbery, rape, and ‘falsifying’ (forgery). 7 Trial by ordeal was perhaps the most often used form of trial under medieval law, and it remains as the earliest known common law form of trial. Its use in Europe dates back at least to the fourth or fifth centuries. The defendant was required to participate in some sort of painful or dangerous experiment or “ordeal” to conclusively establish his guilt or innocence.
Van Dyke, Jury Selection Procedures: Our Uncertain Commitment to Representative Panels, 4 (1977). The Origins of the Doctrine 21 in conviction rates. 44 Because early jurors were expected to be witnesses, an “incorrect” verdict was considered perjury. ” An attaint was a writ to inquire as to whether a trial jury had given a false verdict, and to reverse that verdict, if false. Attaints were tried by a grand assise, consisting of 24 jurors. The attaint jury would receive the same evidence that was heard by the trial jury.